Smart Lightning Protection

Choosing Air Terminals: Rods, Strips and Meshes—Defining Protection Zone by the Rolling Sphere Method

Should the roof use a rod, a tape, or a mesh? The answer: the air-termination form follows the building outline — protruding parts (roof ridges, tower tops) use air-termination rods, flat roofs use ai

2026-10-18 Smart Lightning Protection FEXLINK Research 8 min
Choosing Air Terminals: Rods, Strips and Meshes—Defining Protection Zone by the Rolling Sphere Method
Choosing Air Terminals: Rods, Strips and Meshes—Defining Protection Zone by the Rolling Sphere Method

Direct Answer

Should the roof use a rod, a tape, or a mesh? The answer: the air-termination form follows the building outline — protruding parts (roof ridges, tower tops) use air-termination rods, flat roofs use air-termination tapes along the edges, and large or important roofs use air-termination meshes. The protection range is verified by the rolling-sphere method (taking the sphere radius by the lightning-protection class), ensuring protected objects do not fall outside the range — it is not "the higher the rod, the better".

At a plant, a high rod was erected at the center of the roof following a drawing, ignoring a large roof-mounted unit on the far side of the ridge: by the rolling-sphere calculation, that unit lay outside the protection range, and it was struck twice in the storm season. After adding a tape along the ridge plus local protection for the unit, the problem disappeared. The key distinction: air termination is not "the higher, the better" — the form is chosen by the building shape (rod/tape/mesh), the range is verified by the rolling sphere, and misses usually come from "copying the drawing without looking at the shape".

Why:

- Three forms: the rod covers protrusions, the tape covers flat edges, the mesh covers large areas; - The rolling sphere: the radius is taken by the lightning-protection class; - Protected objects: must lie within the protection range; - Special treatment: protrusions/antennas/PV panels are verified separately.

Key insight: "Choose the air-termination form by the building outline and verify the range by the rolling sphere — being high does not mean being protected; misses come from ignoring the shape."

At a park, solar panels were added to the roof without re-verifying the air-termination coverage, and a strike damaged several modules. After re-calculating the rolling-sphere range for the panel positions and adding tapes, the damage did not recur. Lesson: adding roof protrusions (PV/antennas) requires re-verifying the protection range — the old scheme does not automatically cover new objects.

1. The Applicable Parts of the Three Air-Termination Forms

Step one: where the rod, tape and mesh go.

Air-termination rod (mast): - For protruding parts: roof ridges, tower tops, water towers; - Single-point protection; the coverage is set by the height; - Priority on the highest protrusions; - Free-standing masts also work.

Air-termination tape: - For flat roofs: along ridges, eaves, parapets; - Laid along edges; line-type protection; - Large coverage, fitting the building; - The most common roof form.

Air-termination mesh: - For large/important roofs; - Laid in a grid; full coverage; - The mesh size follows the class; - For important buildings/special places.

Key insight: "The rod covers protrusions, the tape covers edges, the mesh covers large areas — the form follows the building outline, not an arbitrary rod."

2. The Rolling-Sphere Method and the Radius by Class

Step two: how the protection range is calculated.

The rolling-sphere principle: - A sphere of the rolling radius rolls along the ground; - It is tangent to the air terminations and the ground; - The zone inside the sphere is the protection range; - The untouched zone is the blind area.

The radius by class: - Class I: rolling radius 30 m; - Class II: 45 m; - Class III: 60 m; - The higher the class, the smaller the radius, the stricter the protection.

The effect of the value: - A smaller radius → a narrower range; - Class I is the strictest; - The higher the rod, the wider the single coverage but the easier to miss at the edges; - Taking the radius by class is key.

Key insight: "The rolling sphere rolls along the ground and cuts out the protection range — the radius follows the class (I: 30 m, II: 45 m, III: 60 m); a higher class means stricter protection."

3. How Protected Objects Fall within the Range

Step three: how to confirm the protection holds.

The calculation steps: - Determine the building's class (connecting to KD-0179); - Take the corresponding rolling radius; - Roll the sphere along the building outline; - See whether the protected object is inside.

Common misses: - A protrusion outside the rod's range; - No tape at the roof edges; - Too large a mesh on a big roof; - New objects not re-verified.

How to confirm: - Calculate by the range diagram; - Check every protected object point by point; - Add air terminations where there are blind zones; - Double-verify with software/diagrams.

Key insight: "Every protected object must lie inside the sphere — check point by point and add where there are blind zones; 'roughly within range' is where misses happen."

4. Special Treatment of Protrusions, Antennas and Solar Panels

Step four: what to do about new things on the roof.

Types of protrusions: - Antennas/lightning arresters/exhaust pipes; - Solar panels/PV supports; - Cooling towers/water tanks/decorations; - Protrusions higher than the tape.

The treatment principles: - Higher than the tape → add separate protection; - Solar panels are conductors → bring them into the air-termination system; - Antennas need side-flash/equipotential protection; - New protrusions must be re-verified.

Common errors: - Adding PV without re-verifying the range; - Protruding metal not connected to the down-conductor; - Insufficient clearance between antennas and the tape; - Believing "a rod on the roof covers everything".

Key insight: "New roof protrusions (PV/antennas) must be re-verified and brought into the system — the old protection range does not automatically cover new objects."

5. The Connection Requirements between Air Terminations and Down-Conductors

Step five: the air-termination → down-conductor → earthing chain.

Connection requirements: - Reliable connection between the air terminations and the down-conductors; - Multiple down-conductors for shunting (connecting to KD-0182); - Welded/mechanical reliability at the joints; - Electrical continuity and low impedance.

Counterattack prevention: - Keep the clearance between the down-conductors and protected objects; - Use equipotential bonding when it cannot be met; - The down-conductor potential is high when carrying current; - The whole system is continuously connected.

Practice verification: - Verify the connections by continuity testing; - Monitor online with the FR Earth-Resistance Monitor; - Recheck the connections after strikes; - Repair abnormalities in time.

Key insight: "Air termination → down-conductor → earthing is one chain — reliable connection, electrical continuity, measurable continuity; a break in any link makes it all useless."

6. Product Implementation: Air Termination and Earthing as One

WeiWuLian products manage the air-termination system:

- FR Earth-Resistance Monitor: online monitoring of the earthing system; - Continuity recheck: verifying the air-termination-down-conductor-earthing connections; - Strike-event correlation: rechecking the system after strikes; - Data loop: digitizing the range and the state.

The design principle in one sentence: "Form by the outline, range by the rolling sphere, connection by continuity — close the three and manage the air-termination system with data."

7. Common Misjudgments

1. "The higher, the better": ignoring edge misses. Result: a protrusion outside the protection. Correct: choose the form by the shape and verify by the rolling sphere. 2. "Copy the rod from the drawing": ignoring the building shape. Result: misses/waste. Correct: choose rod/tape/mesh by the outline. 3. "Take any radius": ignoring the class. Result: insufficient protection. Correct: take the radius by the class. 4. "No need to recheck after adding PV": ignoring new objects. Result: damaged modules. Correct: re-verify and add protection. 5. "Connect it loosely": ignoring electrical continuity. Result: a broken chain, failed protection. Correct: verify by continuity testing.

Scope and Limitations

This article explains the applicable parts of the three air-termination forms (rod/tape/mesh), rolling-sphere range calculation, protected-object confirmation, special treatment of protrusions, and the connection requirements with down-conductors, applicable to air-termination selection and range calculation. The exact rolling radii and layouts follow GB 50057-2010 and its revisions; this article explains only the selection logic and calculation method. All cases are anonymized (a plant, a park) and do not refer to any specific customer.

FAQ

Should the roof use a rod, a tape, or a mesh? The answer: the air-termination form follows the building outline — protruding parts (roof ridges, tower tops) use air-termination rods, flat roofs use ai
Should the roof use a rod, a tape, or a mesh? The answer: the air-termination form follows the building outline — protruding parts (roof ridges, tower tops) use air-termination rods, flat roofs use air-termination tapes along the edges, and large or important roofs use air-termination meshes. The protection range is verified by the rolling-sphere method (taking the sphere radius by the lightning-protection class), ensuring protected objects do not fall outside the range — it is not "the higher the rod, the better".

Want a deeper look at FEXLINK solutions?

Contact the FEXLINK solutions team for customised solutions and technical support.